Legal Opinion
Sofferin v. American Airlines, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 9, 1992No. 88 C 9938PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the court is American Airlines, Incorporated’s (“American”) motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 to strike and dismiss portions of Count I and the entirety of Count II of Jefferey L. Sofferin’s (“plaintiff”) First Amended Complaint. For reasons detailed below, the motion is granted.
FACTS
The Amended Complaint and briefs reveal that plaintiff was employed as a probationary co-pilot with American from February, 1986, to February, 1987. His goal was to become an American pilot. During his term he flew with several American pilots as part of the…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ribando v. United Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- Craig v. Ohio Department of Administrative ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
- Jaekel v. Equifax Marketing Decision Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
- King v. Tandy Corporation/Radio ShackDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1992
- Autrey v. Potlatch Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.