Legal Opinion
Autrey v. Potlatch Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 18, 1992No. C-89-3695-SBAPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO AMEND
ARMSTRONG, District Judge.
I
BACKGROUND
On October 10, 1989, plaintiffs Laura Autrey (“Autrey”) and Rita Schroeder (“Schroeder”) filed a gender discrimination action against defendant Potlatch Corporation (“Potlatch”) pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as well as California Government Code § 12940 et seq., Article I, Section 8 of the California Constitution, and California Civil Code § 51.7. Since the filing of this action, Au-trey has settled her case with Potlatch and now seeks leave to amend…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. SavageDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017