Legal Opinion

Williamson v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 18, 1975No. 690, September Term, 1974PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLowe, J.

Trial by Court or Jury

In State v. Zimmerman, 261 Md. 11, where the record reflected only defense counsel’s verbalization of the election of a bench trial, the Court of Appeals decided that a post-conviction proceeding was the most appropriate forum for deciding in the first instance whether the defendant had knowingly foregone his right to jury trial. The Court concluded that a “preferable practice” in accepting an election of trial by the court was for:

“. . . the trial judge to determine on the record whether this is a knowing election on the part of the accused of a court trial in lieu of a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  3. State v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  4. State v. BabbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  5. Peterson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. Sims v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. State v. WallerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  4. United States v. Randolph Edgar DavenportCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  5. State v. TribbleSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API