Legal Opinion

Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. Norton

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 11, 2007No. 05-35408, 05-35413, 05-35540, 05-35586, 05-35587PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge KLEINFELD; Dissent by Chief Judge SCHROEDER.

KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge:

This appeal challenges an injunction limiting but not entirely prohibiting coal bed methane development while the Bureau of Land Management expands an environmental impact statement.1

Facts

The Powder River Basin in Montana and Wyoming is the largest coal deposit in the United States and among the largest in the world. For over a century, it has been developed into ranches, farms, and coal mines. Farmers and ranchers generally have surface rights to the land involved in this case, but not hell-to-heaven…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' CooperativeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Tri-Valley Cares v. U.S. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.District Court, C.D. California · 2007
  3. BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. v. IEC (Montgomery), LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Pit River Tribe v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Havasupai Tribe v. Heather ProvencioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API