Legal Opinion

State of Minnesota v. Maureen Ndidiamaka Onyelobi

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 18, 2016No. A15-267PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILDEA, Chief Justice.

Following a jury trial, appellant Maureen Ndidiamaka Onyelobi was convicted of first-degree premeditated murder on an accomplice-liability theory, see Minn.Stat. § 609.185(a)(1) (2014). On appeal, Onyelo-bi submits several claims of error. First, Onyelobi argues that her arrest was not supported by probable cause and therefore evidence seized as a result of her arrest should have been suppressed. Second, Onyelobi argues that the district court erroneously denied her jury selection challenges under Batson v, Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Miller-El v. DretkeSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Rosemond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  2. Onyelobi v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
  3. State v. HarveySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
  4. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  5. State of Minnesota v. Andrew Vernard GloverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API