Legal Opinion

Drefs v. Holman Transfer Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1929PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcBRIDE, J.

While it seems probable that a cause of action exists which could be properly urged by an administrator of the deceased under Section 380, Or. L., we are of the opinion that no cause of action exists under the Employers’ Liability Act. Soon after the statute was enacted, cases began coming to this court involving the construction of various phases of the statute, and from the decisions of these cases, the writer feels that we have deduced and worked out the following formula:

In order that an employee may recover under the Employers’ Liability Act, the orbit or scope of his employment must…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rorvik v. North Pac. Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. State v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Turnidge v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Clayton v. Enterprise Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hess v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Rich v. Tite-Knot Pine MillOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Thomas v. FoglioOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Sacher v. Bohemia, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Myers v. StaubOregon Supreme Court · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API