State Ex Rel. Cook v. Court of Common Pleas
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
The relator seeks by writ of mandamus ail order to strike the nunc pro tunc entry from the files. That writ “cannot control judicial discretion” (Section 12285, General Code) and the writ “must not be issued in a case where there is a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law” (Section 12287, General Code). The Court of Common Pleas exercised its judicial discretion in entering the nunc pro tunc order and the relator has a plain and adequate remedy by appeal. State, ex rel. McCamey, v. Court of Common Pleas, 137 Ohio St., 566, 31 N. E. (2d), 683.
The judgment of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. McCamey v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1941
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Ticknor v. RandallOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- State Ex Rel. Dunphy v. GrahamOhio Supreme Court · 1946
- State Ex Rel. Luckhaupt v. McClellandOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- State Ex Rel. Luckhaupt v. McClellandOhio Supreme Court · 1949