Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Cook v. Court of Common Pleas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1945No. 30176PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The relator seeks by writ of mandamus ail order to strike the nunc pro tunc entry from the files. That writ “cannot control judicial discretion” (Section 12285, General Code) and the writ “must not be issued in a case where there is a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law” (Section 12287, General Code). The Court of Common Pleas exercised its judicial discretion in entering the nunc pro tunc order and the relator has a plain and adequate remedy by appeal. State, ex rel. McCamey, v. Court of Common Pleas, 137 Ohio St., 566, 31 N. E. (2d), 683.

The judgment of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. McCamey v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ticknor v. RandallOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State Ex Rel. Dunphy v. GrahamOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  3. State Ex Rel. Luckhaupt v. McClellandOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  4. State Ex Rel. Luckhaupt v. McClellandOhio Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API