Legal Opinion

United States v. American Sugar Refining Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 28, 1906No. 269PublishedCited by 51 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. The question in the case is whether certain sugars which were imported between the twelfth of June and the twenty-eighth of September, 1903, were chargeable "with full duties under the tariff act of July 24,1897, or were entitled to twenty per cent reduction of duties prescribed by that act, under the treaty between the United States and' Cuba of the date December 11, 1902, and an act…

Read the full summary

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. The question in the case is whether certain sugars which were imported between the twelfth of June and the twenty-eighth of September, 1903, were chargeable "with full duties under the tariff act of July 24,1897, or were entitled to twenty per cent reduction of duties prescribed by that act, under the treaty between the United States and' Cuba of the date December 11, 1902, and an act of Congress of December 17, 1903. The answer to the question depends upon when the treaty went into effect, whether upon…

1Opinion of the Court 1

After stating the case, as above,

2Opinion of the Court · McKennaJustice McKenna

The treaty as drafted and presented to the Senate provided for an exchange of ratifications at Washington as soon as might be before the thirty-first day of January, 1903, and should “ go into effect on the tenth day after the exchange of ratifications. ” A supplemental convention became necessary, and an exchange of ratifications was provided to be “as soon as possible and within two months from January 31, 1903. ” But subsequent to that date, to wit, March 19, 1903, the Senate added the amendment: “This convention shall not take effect until the same shall…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. GoldenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. United States v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

4Cited by51 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad v. Laramie Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Struthers Wells Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Kephart v. KephartCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  4. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Ashley v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API