Reo Motors, Inc. v. Wolf
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, J.,
This case comes before the court on preliminary objections filed by plaintiff to a counterclaim pleaded by one of the defendants in the answer. The action is in trespass. The counterclaim is in assumpsit. The preliminary objections question first, the right to file the counterclaim and second, the sufficiency thereof. The pleadings material to the questions thus raised are as follows:
*464 The Complaint
The complaint avers that on certain dates in July and August 1948 plaintiff and the three defendants, trading as Mid State Motors, and individually through their duly authorized agent,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kent v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Ward v. ZeiglerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Story & Isham Commercial Co. v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- King v. Coe Commission Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Mulcahy v. DugganMontana Supreme Court · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.