Legal Opinion

Mulcahy v. Duggan

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1923No. 5,089PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. COMMISSIONER BENNETT

prepared the opinion for the court.

This action was instituted by the plaintiff, J. B. Mulcahy, against the defendant, Lawrence Duggan, to recover actual *12and exemplary damages alleged to have resulted from a physical encounter between the parties, which took place on May 17, 1920, at the city of Butte. Plaintiff alleged that “the defendant violently, wantonly and maliciously did assault the plaintiff, * * * ” and defendant answered admitting that he “did strike the plaintiff several blows and did knock him down.” In addition to the admissions and denials, defendant set…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Earl v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Scott v. WaggonerMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Story & Isham Commercial Co. v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Kinsman v. StanhopeMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Macdougall v. MaguireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HerringMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Friedrichsen v. CobbMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Hageman v. ArnoldMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Griffiths v. ThrasherMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Pioneer Engineering Works, Inc. v. McConnellMontana Supreme Court · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API