Legal Opinion

York Properties, Inc. v. Neidoff

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1957PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenry Clay Greenberg, J.

Defendants ’ motion to dismiss the complaint for alleged insufficiency and incapacity of plaintiff to sue for the relief demanded therein is based on the following specific grounds: (1) that a pledgee of corporate stock does not have legal capacity to maintain a derivative suit on behalf of the corporation; and (2) that the complaint fails to show affirmatively that the plaintiff was a stockholder at the time of . the transaction (General Corporation Law, §¿61).

While, as hereinafter indicated, the complaint requires amendment, defendants’ stated grounds of objection cannot be legally…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Campbell v. American Zylonite Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Kono v. RoethAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  3. Murrin v. . Archbald Consolidated Coal CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Austin v. GardinerNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Murrin v. Archbald Consolidated Coal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Verrey v. EllsworthDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  2. Blankman v. Nino's Continental, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Gittleman v. DoyleNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  4. In re BowmanNew York Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API