Kono v. Roeth
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.
The question presented is whether the complaint, giving it every fair intendment to which it is entitled upon a motion addressed to its sufficiency, pursuant to a motion for judgment on the pleadings under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice, states a cause of action against the respondent defendants.
The plaintiff sues as the ancillary temporary administrator of the estate of Hisashi Fujimura, and has been substituted in place of the latter, who instituted this action.
The complaint alleges that the defendant Robins had pledged with Fujimura, hereinafter designated plaintiff, eighty shares…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gillet v. . Bank of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- General Rubber Co. v. . BenedictNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- von Au v. MagenheimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Ritchie v. McMullenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- Tillie Von Au v. MagenheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Citibank, N. A. v. PlapingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Lesnik v. Public Industrials CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Empire Life Insurance Company of America v. Valdak CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Banker's Trust Co. v. SteenburnNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- Seneca v. NovaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.