Legal Opinion

Austin v. Gardiner

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1947PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.

This motion to dismiss the complaint is disposed of as follows: (1) Section 61 of the General Corporation Law requires that in a derivative stockholder’s action “ it must be made to appear that the plaintiff was a stockholder at the time of the transaction of which he complains * * A proper compliance with the provisions of this section requires an allegation in the complaint setting forth the date, exact or approximate, when it is claimed that the plaintiff became a stockholder. It will then become apparent from the face of the complaint itself whether and to what extent the plaintiff has…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clayton v. FarishNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  2. York Properties, Inc. v. NeidoffNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Northridge Cooperative Section No. 1, Inc. v. 32nd Avenue Construction Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Sorin v. SharmoonNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Abramson v. BlakeleyNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API