Legal Opinion

Kahn v. Berman

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 29, 1988No. A036381PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SABRAW, J.

William and Nana Berman appeal from an order permitting the sale of their personal residence pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 704.780. 1 Plaintiffs William, Christine, John and Elva Kahn cross-appeal from the same order. We reverse.

I. The Factual and Procedural History

William and John Kahn contracted with William Berman, Carl Pecson and Ace Truck & Equipment Rental, Inc., for the purchase of the Ace rental business in Las Vegas, Nevada. After disputes arose between the parties, litigation ensued in the Nevada state courts. In 1981, following a court trial of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. McElmoyle Ex Rel. Bailey v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  4. Kappel v. BartlettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Ingebretsen v. McNamerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hyman v. Plotkin (In Re Hyman)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Diamond Heights Village Ass'n v. Financial Freedom Senior Funding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Washoe Development Co. v. Guaranty Federal BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Ford Consumer Finance Co. v. McDonell (In Re McDonell)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. R.S. v. Pacificare Life & Health InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API