Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Case

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1887No. 12,980PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollaks, C. J.

Appellees brought this suit against appellant and her husband to foreclose a mortgage executed by them in July, 1880.

It is insisted here that the court below erred in refusing • leave to appellant to file amended and additional answers.

As to the first and second answers tendered, it will not be necessary for us to decide whether or not appellant was chargeable with such laches as justified the court in refusing leave to file them. There was no available error in the refusal, for the sufficient reason that the facts set up in those answers were insufficient as defences to the action, and hence…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ex parte WallsIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Dodge v. PopeIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Bass v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Thomas v. DaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Blair v. CurryIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Pouder v. TateIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Lane v. SchlemmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Bozarth v. McGillicuddyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Wills v. Mooney-Mueller Drug Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API