Watson v. Harmon
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Goolsby, Judge:
The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether an action may be maintained by members of the public, the appellants Julian R. Watson and Barbara J. Watson, on a statutory bond submitted in lieu of proof of financial responsibility by a licensed home builder, B. Stuart Harmon, against the surety, The Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, where the statute authorizing the bond does not expressly give a right of action on the bond to persons damaged by acts or omissions of the home builder. We hold that such an action can be brought. The judgment below is reversed and the action is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
- Henderson v. EvansSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- Graybar Electric Co. v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Kimbrell v. HeffnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Anchor Casualty Co. v. Commissioner of SecuritiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kennedy v. HendersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
- Koster v. ChowdhuryOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Wagner v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
- Action Mortgage Corp. v. Van DeusenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
- Brailsford v. Lawyers Surety Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.