Legal Opinion

Anchor Casualty Co. v. Commissioner of Securities

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 13, 1961No. 38,001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loevinger, Justice.

This is a declaratory judgment action to determine the scope of a bond.

Plaintiff, a paid corporate surety, issued a series of bonds for one Drew Forsman pursuant to Minn. St. 82.03, subd. 3, 1 a provision of the real estate brokers’ licensing act. Subsequently, the private defendants sued to recover losses resulting from alleged fraud of Fors-man in real estate transactions. Plaintiff then brought this action to determine the extent of its liability upon the bonds for claims against Forsman, alleging that the commissioner of securities was the only party entitled to enforce…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Guaranteed Gravel & Sand Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  2. Vukmirovich v. NickolichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Graybar Electric Co. v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Watson v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Hedberg & Sons Co. v. NEW AMSTERDAM CAS. CO. OF NYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. Milwaukee Enforcers, Inc. v. BallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API