Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Henderson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 21, 1986No. 22592PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finney, Justice:

This is an action for damages by the respondents (Ken-nedys) against the defendant builder and his insurance company, the appellant (Sentry), for alleged misconduct by the builder. We reverse.

The Kennedys engaged the builder to construct a dwelling-house type building to be used as a nursery. They ad vanced eléven thousand ($11,000.00) dollars to be placed in trust and used for labor and materials. The builder never commenced construction on the building nor returned the monies paid to him.

The builder is a licensed builder under the laws of South Carolina and the rules and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brown v. South Carolina InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Springfield v. Williams Plumbing Supply Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  3. Blandon v. ColemanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Swinton v. Chubb & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Watson v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gentry v. YonceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Garner v. Morrison Knudsen Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Cook v. MacK's Transfer & StorageCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Gray v. Petoseed Co., Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1996
  5. Kleckley v. Northwestern National Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API