Legal Opinion

Picard v. State

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 19, 1983No. 69283PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLE, Justice.

The petitioner John Picard appeals from the district court’s denial of his application for postconviction relief. Petitioner contends that his good time, which was taken away pursuant to Iowa Code section 246.-41(5) (1981), should be restored because prison authorities did not follow the procedures required under rule 804, Policy and Procedural Guidelines: Procedures for Disciplinary Control of Inmates, and because the prison authorities violated his constitutional right to due process of law. We affirm.

The petitioner has been an inmate at the Iowa State Penitentiary since…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. BurtlowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  3. Stanford v. Iowa State ReformatorySupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  4. Rinehart v. BrewerDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1980
  5. Bartholomew v. ReedDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sanford v. ManternachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  2. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  3. Backstrom v. Iowa District Court for Jones CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  4. Henderson v. Commissioners of BarnstableMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  5. Niday v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API