People v. Stacy
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
It is alleged in the complaint that on the third day of August, 1885, one H. T. Walker was appointed by the board of supervisors of San Bernardino County a license-tax collector for the first supervisoral district of that county; that to secure the faithful performance of the duties of the office, Walker gave a bond in the penal sum of three thousand dollars, which was accepted and approved by the chairman of the board; and that subsequently one of the sureties on his bond withdrew, and he thereupon gave a supplemental bond, which was also acceptéd and approved by the chairman…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. McCarty v. PepperIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
- Hubert v. MendheimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- City of Los Angeles v. MellusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- People v. FergusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- County of Amador v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cavanaugh v. CasselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Baker County v. HuntingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1906
- Birmingham News Co. v. MoseleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- State v. McDonaldIdaho Supreme Court · 1895
- Crudup v. Oklahoma Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916