Crudup v. Oklahoma Portland Cement Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Bryan County; Jesse M. Hatchett, Judge. Action by the Oklahoma Portland Cement Company against R. L. Crudup and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LINN, C.
The Oklahoma Portland Cement-Company, defendant in error and plaintiff below, by proper proceedings in the district court, sought a recovery against defendants as sureties upon a certain obligation executed in favor of the independent school district of Celeste, Tex., and primarily for its benefit, but with a provision intended as security for parties who might furnish material, labor, etc.
In substance, among other things, it was alleged in the petition that plaintiff had furnished cement to the value of $503.10 which was used in the construction of a certain school…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Doll v. CrumeNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Kaufmann v. CooperNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Cutter v. WhittemoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
- Gibbs & Sterrett Manufacturing Co. v. BruckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- State ex rel. Moore v. SanduskySupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- St. Paul Foundry Co. v. EvensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Birmingham News Co. v. MoseleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Harris v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950