Bird v. Utica Gold Mining Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco refusing a change of the place of trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying defendants’ motion for a change of the place of trial from the city and county of San Francisco to Calaveras county. The motion was made upon the ground that the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by such change. The action has since been tried, as appears by the appeal from the judgment now pending in this court (post, p. 674, 84 Pac. 256).
The refusing or granting of a motion for a change of venue upon the ground that the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted thereby lies in the sound legal…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reavis v. CowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Hanchett v. FinchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Avila v. MeHerinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works v. HouserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Bird v. Utica Gold Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Blossom v. WallerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Topham v. HuntingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Ryan v. Inyo Cerro Gordo Mining & Power Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919