Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Houser
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County denying a motion for change of place of trial. . The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the superior court of Los Angeles county, denying its motion for a change of the place of trial of the action from that county to San Joaquin county. The motion was made upon the ground that the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by the change.
The plaintiff was a corporation, organized under the laws of this state, and having its principal place of business at the city of Stockton, in San Joaquin county. Its capital stock was $300,000, divided into 3,000 shares, of which about 2,800 had been…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. VincentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Hanchett v. FinchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Avila v. MeHerinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Clanton v. RuffnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by7 opinions
- Price v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
- Blossom v. WallerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- J. I. Case Threshing Co. v. Copren Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1917
- Maxwell v. MurrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Werner v. BrydenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.