Legal Opinion
Green v. Rancho Santa Margarita Mortgage Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 30, 1994No. G013473PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SILLS, P. J.
When George and Elizabeth Green went to a mortgage broker to obtain a loan for the new $440,000 house they wanted to buy in Coto de Caza, they had a monthly income in excess of $16,000, more than $50,000 in savings, and six pieces of real property with a net value of $290,000. Their debts (exclusive of encumbrances on their real property) were less than $35,000, and over 70 percent of that represented car loans. Despite the fact that there were lenders willing to make the Greens a loan, the lending officer at the mortgage broker told Elizabeth Green that she could not find…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Mixon v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Clark v. Claremont University Center & Graduate SchoolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Rainer v. Community Memorial HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Hersant v. Department of Social ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Emerald Bay Community Ass'n v. Golden Eagle InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Iniestra v. Cliff Warren Investments, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.