Legal Opinion
Mixon v. Fair Employment & Housing Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 24, 1987No. H001787PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRAUER, J.
Robert Mixon appeals from an order denying his petition for a writ of administrative mandamus seeking to overturn a decision of the Fair Employment and Housing Commission (the FEHC or the Commission). The Commission had found that Mixon’s employer, the Hospital and Institutional Workers’ Union, Local 250 (Local 250), had not discriminated against him on the basis of race when it terminated his employment. Mix-on’s petition challenged this decision on the ground that it was not supported by the Commission’s findings. After reviewing this same question on appeal we have…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
- David W. Jackson v. Southern California Gas Company Claudia Dodson Lois Durfee Mary Moore Jean Bish Betty Shattery Pat ShatteryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Rains v. Criterion Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Jensen v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.