Gray v. State Ex Rel. Coghlen, 9131
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Marion Superior Court.
1Opinion of the Court
This case originated in a complaint by the appellee against the Governor. Attorney General, Treasurer and Secretary of State, of the State of Indiana, for a writ of mandate.
Objection is made to the complaint, but as the cause was finally submitted on an agreed statement of the facts in at: cordance, as we think, with section 386 of the code, we deem it unnecessary to set out the complaint, or inquire into its sufficiency.
The following is the agreed statement of the. facts, accompanied with the affidavit required by the statute:
"Come now the above named parties, the State of Indiana, on…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Murray v. CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- National Bank of the Commonwealth v. Mechanics' National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Flournoy v. City of JeffersonvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
- State v. BowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Holden v. Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Carr v. State ex rel. CoetlosquetIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Ellingham v. DyeIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Sims v. City of FrankfortIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Tucker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
- State ex rel. Clark v. Haworth, School Trustee of Monroe School TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.