Legal Opinion

Saxton v. Perry

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1910No. 5853PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from El Paso District Court — Hon. Louis W. Cunningham, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

The plaintiffs below, A. W. Perry and others, claiming to be the owners of the Nevada placer min*264ing claim, embracing tbe N. W. 4 of the S. E. 4? the E. 4 of the S, W. 4, and the S. E. 4 of the N. W. 4, Section 12, Township 12 South, Range 62 West, in El Paso county, Colorado, brought an adverse suit in the district court of El Paso county against C. B. Saxton and others, claiming to be the owners of the Wells placer mining claim, and applying for a patent thereto, covering the identical ground embraced in the Nevada placer. The plaintiffs had judgment upon a directed verdict, and the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Del Monte Mining & Milling Co. v. Last Chance Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Smith v. . WestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Hopkins v. NoyesMontana Supreme Court · 1883

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Parker v. PlymptonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  2. Commonwealth Casualty Insurance v. KuhrtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  3. O'Brien v. Galley-Stockton Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  4. Roberts v. MortonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1975
  5. McGhee Investment Co. v. KirsherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API