Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Casualty Insurance v. Kuhrt

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 7, 1924No. 10,651PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Teller

Action by defendant in error to recover upon an accident insurance policy for $5,000 alleged to be due under said policy on the death of the insured.

The complaint contained a cause of action on the policy, *177and another on an oral contract of insurance. Both sides moved for a directed verdict. The court sustained the motion of the plaintiff, and held that an oral contract had been established by the evidence, and directed a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $5,000. Such finding has the effect of a general verdict (Saxton v. Perry, 47 Colo. 263, 107 Pac. 281), and the only question to be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Saxton v. PerrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  2. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n of New York v. KittenringSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wade v. Olinger Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  2. Parker v. PlymptonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  3. Benson v. Bankers Life and Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  4. Warner v. Farmers' Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
  5. Cadez v. General Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API