Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Sato v. Plunkett

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 15, 1994No. 94 C 60PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.†

Some litigants refuse to accept defeat. On they wade, naming the judges and lawyers in the prior case as additional defendants in an ever-widening conspiracy.

Mark Sato is such a person—and he finds it easy to believe that the judges who rule against him are malefactors, for he seems to think that everyone is in cahoots with the forces of evil. The complaint in this case accuses Presidents Bush and Clinton of treason, asserts that the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith is involved with the Mossad and Bank Leumi in a “treasonous” scheme to launder money,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Support Systems International, Inc. v. Richard MackCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. Raymond Homola v. Paul McNamaraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  3. Shepherdson v. NigroDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Shepherdson v. NigroDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Larue v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1997

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API