MARCTEC, LLC v. Johnson & Johnson
District Court, S.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NONIN-FRINGEMENT
HERNDON, Chief Judge:
This matter came before the Court on the Motion, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by Cordis Corporation and Johnson & Johnson (collectively “Cordis”) for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,128,753 (“the '753 patent”) and 7,217,290 (“the '290 patent”) (collectively “the patents-in-suit” or “Bonutti patents”). D.I. 68. After consideration of that motion and subsequent briefing (D.I. 108, D.I. 125), the Court makes…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Marctec, LLC v. Johnson & JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- General Protecht Group, Inc. v. Leviton Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015