Legal Opinion

Keene v. Roxbury

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 26, 1924PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, J.

“Property held by a city, town or precinct in another city or town for the purpose of a water supply, if yielding no rent, shall not be liable to taxation therein, but the city, town or precinct ,,so holding it shall annually pay to the city or town in which such property lies an amount equal to that which such place would receive for taxes upon the average of the assessed value of such land without buildings or other structures for the three years last preceding the acquisition thereof, the valuation for each year being reduced by all abatements thereon; but any part of such land or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Taggart v. HolcombSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. Milford Water Co. v. Inhabitants of HopkintonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  3. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Village of Hardwick v. Town of WolcottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  2. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  3. Lisbon Village District v. LisbonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  4. City of Shreveport v. CaseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  5. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API