Legal Opinion

City of Shreveport v. Case

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 3, 1941No. 36297PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCALEB, Justice.

The defendant, Joe Case, was prosecuted in the City Court of Shreveport for operating a motor boat on Cross Lake without a muffler in violation of City Ordinance No. 30 of 1939, the pertinent part of which provides that: “No motor boat shall be permitted upon the waters of Cross Lake unless and until the same is equipped with a muffler in good working order, and if the same be equipped with a cut-out, the same shall be kept closed.”

He moved to quash the charge made against him on the ground that the city ordinance is unconstitutional, null and void for eight separate and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Keene v. RoxburySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1924
  2. City of Shreveport v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Charles v. Town of Jeanerette, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Energy Mgmt Corp v. City of ShreveportCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  3. Energy Management Corp. v. City of ShreveportCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  4. West Cameron Port v. Lake Charles Harbor & Terminal Dist.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Med Life Emergency Services, Inc. v. Ouachita Parish Police JuryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API