Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Crider
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MARSHALL, District Judge.
Before me are cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c), filed by the plaintiff Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company (hereinafter “Hartford”), the defendant, Wayne Crider, d/b/a Crider & Sons Boring & Jacking (hereinafter “Crider”), and the intervenor, Santucci Construction Company (hereinafter “Santucci”). The underlying action is Hartford’s suit for declaratory judgment to determine its duties and liabilities under a general liability insurance policy is sued to Crider. Santucci was granted leave to intervene. Jurisdiction…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Sims Ex Rel. Ruark v. Illinois National Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1963
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,524 Carl Mintz and Shirley Mintz v. Mathers Fund, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Case Foundation Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Loewenthal v. Security InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Noyes Supervision, Inc. v. Canadian Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1980
- Westport Ins. Corp. v. VN HOTEL GROUP, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2010
- Adams Laboratories, Inc. v. Jacobs Engineering Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
- Roberts v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.