Legal Opinion
Noyes Supervision, Inc. v. Canadian Indemnity Co.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided March 20, 1980No. Civ. A. 78-A-1051PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ARRAJ, District Judge.
In this diversity case plaintiff seeks to hold defendant liable under an insurance policy for certain damage to a gas well. Plaintiff, Noyes Supervision, Inc., is a Colorado corporation and defendant Canadian Indemnity Co. is the Canadian insurance company which issued the policy involved in this action. Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., on the grounds that plaintiff breached the notice condition of the policy and that the loss is not covered because of certain exclusions contained in the policy.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Marx v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- Government Employees Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Certified Indemnity Company v. ThunSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Henry Warren Horn v. Burns and Roe, a Corporation, and Stearns-Roger, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Martinez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Harad, Charles A. And the Home Insurance Company v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, and Catania, Francis JCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Davis v. M.L.G. Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Mountain Fuel Supply, a Utah Corporation, and Cna Insurance Company v. Reliance Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Mincin v. Vail Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Zurich American Insurance v. O'Hara Regional Center for RehabilitationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.