Legal Opinion

Peranzo v. Coughlin

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 14, 1985No. 84 CIV 8787 (LBS)PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAND, District Judge.

I

As part of a continuing effort to deal with the troublesome problem of narcotics use within penal institutions, 1 New York, as well as a number of other states, has adopted a program of randomly subjecting inmates’ urine to the Syva EMIT 2 -st drug detection test.

The New York State Department of Correctional' Services has promulgated Departmental Directive #4937, 3 which sets forth the rules governing the state’s operation of its urine testing program. According to the Directive, an inmate may be required to provide a urine sample to prison authorities for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Block v. RutherfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Lahey v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Richard W. Spence v. Hal FarrierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  3. Wykoff v. ResigDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1985
  4. Jones v. McKenzieDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1986
  5. Rivera v. WohlrabDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API