Legal Opinion
City of Chicago v. Harris Trust & Savings Bank
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided February 11, 2004No. 1-02-3213PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE QUINN
delivered the opinion of the court:
This appeal arises from a declaration and motion to abandon filed by plaintiff, City of Chicago (the City), seeking to abandon its taking of a leasehold interest in an outdoor billboard sign utilized by defendant, Whiteco Outdoor Advertising, now known as Lamar Advertising Company (Whiteco). Whiteco sells space on its billboards to third parties in order to convey commercial and noncommercial advertisements to the public. The circuit court approved the declaration, granted the City’s motion to abandon and ordered the City to pay the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Kraft, Inc. v. EdgarIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Almota Farmers Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Paris v. FederIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- R.W. Dunteman Co. v. C/G Enterprises Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lamar Whiteco Outdoor Corp. v. City of West ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Fairbanks Capital v. ColemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Howe v. Retirement Board of the Firemen's Annunity and Benefit Fund of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
- Village of Bellwood v. American National Bank and Trust CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- Village of Bellwood v. American Nat. BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.