Legal Opinion

Paris v. Feder

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1997No. 82713PublishedCited by 219 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bilandic

In this appeal we must determine how the statutory $10,000 limit on recovery from the Real Estate Recovery Fund (225 ILCS 455/23 (West 1992)) operates where multiple parties have been injured as a result of a single transaction.

FACTS

In 1993, the two plaintiffs, John and Barbara Paris, entered into a written agreement to purchase certain real estate located in Skokie, Illinois, from the owner of record. Plaintiffs deposited $20,750 in earnest money with the seller’s licensed real estate broker, Liberty Real Estate, Inc. The purchase agreement terminated without default, but Liberty Real Estate…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Abrahamson v. Illinois Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Kraft, Inc. v. EdgarIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Advincula v. United Blood ServicesIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Solich v. George & Anna Portes Cancer Prevention Center of Chicago, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Lucas v. LakinIllinois Supreme Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by219 opinions

  1. Michigan Avenue National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Cinkus v. Village of Stickney Municipal Officers Electoral BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  3. People v. DonohoIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Land v. Board of Educ. of City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Lulay v. LulayIllinois Supreme Court · 2000

214 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API