Legal Opinion
Roland Ralph Wilborn v. Department of Health and Human Services
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 10, 1995No. 93-35048PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, District Judge:
This is an action brought under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a. The district court granted the motion of defendant Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) for summary judgment, from which plaintiff Wilborn has appealed. 1 The appeal is timely and we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
I. THE UNCONTROVERTED FACTS
Appellant Wilborn was employed as a staff attorney/deeision writer by HHS in Eugene, Oregon, from August, 1986, through August, 1987. His supervisor during this period was the Hearing Office Chief Administrative Law Judge Stephen P. Kramer…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- In Re KOREAN AIR LINES DISASTER OF SEPTEMBER 1, 1983. Appeal of Plaintiffs Steering CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Chan v. Korean Air Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- William Michael Jones v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, United Transportation UnionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Richard C. Bartel v. Federal Aviation Administration Richard C. Bartel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Doe v. ChaoSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Beaven v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Hudson v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Doe v. ChaoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Doe v. Department of Veterans Affairs of USCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.