Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Reno

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 4, 1997No. 96-5232PublishedCited by 155 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROSEN, District Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant Marilyn L. Hudson appeals several rulings of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee in her Title VII sex discrimination action. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff-Appellant Marilyn Hudson, a former Assistant United States Attorney (“AUSA”) brought this action in the District Court alleging that her superiors in the United States Attorney’s office in the Eastern District of Tennessee (1) engaged in sex discrimination and retaliation against her in her employment in violation of Title…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by155 opinions

  1. Janice Adcock-Ladd v. Secretary of Treasury United States Secret Service Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  2. Pollard v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Giles v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  4. Medlock v. Ortho Biotech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. Beaven v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

150 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API