Brooks v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NELSON, Presiding Judge.
This cause presents essentially two questions to this Court for review: 1. 'Is .the award of The Industrial Commission of Arizona for a non-compensable claim supported by the evidence? 2. Was the procedure followed by the hearing officer in arriving at his decision permissible under the statutes and rules governing the procedure before the Commission and its hearing officers ?
John D. Brooks (Brooks), petitioner here, was employed by B-Z Bee Transportation and Warehouse (B-Z Bee), respondent employer, as a part time furniture and equipment mover in Yuma, Arizona.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Malinski v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Micucci v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Ison v. Western Vegetable DistributorsArizona Supreme Court · 1936
- Broadus v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
3Cited by14 opinions
- Herzberg v. DavidCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Ayala v. HillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Adams v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Arizona Law Enforcement Merit System Council v. DannCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Simpson v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.