Legal Opinion

Charles F. Martin, Cross-Appellee v. Norman Industries, Inc., Cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 27, 1984No. 82-3414PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POLITZ, Circuit Judge:

Charles F. Martin sued Norman Industries, Inc. under 35 U.S.C. § 271, alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 4,022,028 (the ’028 patent) issued to Martin on May 10, 1977. The ’028 patent covers an underwater pipe trenching machine cogno-mened “Mole II.” Following a bench trial the district court rendered judgment for Norman Industries, finding the ’028 patent invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) because of public use and sale of the Mole II more than one year prior to the date Martin filed his patent application. The court denied Norman Industries’ motion for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation. Sauquoit Fibers Company v. Leesona Corporation, Kayser-Roth Corporation (In Its Own Name and D/B/A Kayser-Roth Hosiery Companyand Kayser-Roth Hosiery Co., Inc.) v. Leesona Corporation, Leesona Corporation v. The Duplan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. Rena Kardulas v. Florida MacHine Products Company, R.C. Products, Inc., and John M. DudinskyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. Bird Provision Co. v. Owens Country Sausage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. Bourne v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marsh v. Austin-Fort Worth Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  2. System Management Arts, Inc. v. Avesta Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  3. Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
  4. Marsh v. Austin-Fort Worth Coca-Cola Bottling CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API