Legal Opinion

McCloskey v. Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 23, 1989No. 1452PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The issue in this appeal is whether a laborer whose left eye has been injured in an accident but whose vision therein is correctable to 20/40 by lenses is a handicapped person for purposes of applying the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act of October 27, 1955, P.L. 744, as amended, 43 P.S. § 951 et seq.

Frank McCloskey was employed as a yardman by Automobile Transport, Inc. (ATI) for eleven years at ATI’s terminal in Pittsburgh. McCloskey’s duties required that he inspect and unload new automobiles which arrived by train or tractor-trailer and drive them to designated area…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Gen. Elec. Corp. v. COM. PA. HUM. R. COM.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Hostetter v. HooverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Colorado Civil Rights Commission v. North Washington Fire Protection DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brennan v. National Telephone Directory Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Galeone v. American Packaging Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Welcker v. Smithkline BeckmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Waite v. Blair, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Dobre v. National RR Passenger Corp.(AMTRAK)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API