Legal Opinion
Dobre v. National RR Passenger Corp.(AMTRAK)
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 1, 1993No. Civ. A. 93-3504PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HUTTON, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are the defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation’s (“AMTRAK”) Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) or, in the Alternative to Strike Certain Demands, the plaintiff Andria Adams Dobre’s (“Dobre”) response and AMTRAK’s reply.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Dobre, a transsexual, was employed by AMTRAK from May, 1989 until March 28, 1990. When she 1 was hired by AMTRAK, Dobre presented herself as a man. After several months, she informed her supervisors that she was receiving hormone injections in order to begin the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Karen Frances ULANE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EASTERN AIRLINES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Douglas W. Schwenk v. James Hartford Steve Sinclair Robert Mitchell,opinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Holt v. Northwest Pennsylvania Training Partnership Consortium, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Davis v. Sheraton Society Hill HotelDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Schroer v. BillingtonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Maffei v. Kolaeton Industry, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.