Legal Opinion
State of New Hampshire v. Timothy McKenna
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided September 9, 2014No. 2013-0009PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBassett, J.
Following a jury trial in Superior Court (McHugh, J.), the defendant, Timothy McKenna; was convicted of six counts of aggravated felonious sexual assault. RSA 632-A:2 (2007). Prior to trial, the defendant moved to suppress his statements to the police on the ground that he was subject to a custodial interrogation without being informed of his Miranda rights. See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). After an evidentiary hearing, the Superior Court (Delker, J.) denied the motion. The defendant appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. We reverse and remand.
*674The following…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. CastilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- State v. Katlyn MarinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
- State v. Abhishek SachdevSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
- In re B.C.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- In re E.G.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.