Legal Opinion

Marie C. Romulus and Pierrot Romulus v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 13, 1998No. Docket 97-6117PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Per curiam

Marie C. Romulus and Pierrot Romulus appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (David G. Trager, Judge) entered March 28, 1997, dismissing their claims against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b)(1), 2671-2680, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Romulus v. United States, 983 F.Supp. 336 (E.D.N.Y.1997).

In August 1994, Marie and Pierrot Romulus each filed a Standard Form (“SF”) 95 claim form alleging personal injury and property damages, respectively, stemming from an accident during which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Keene Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  2. Michael Ikelionwu v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. Melissa Johnson, an Infant by Barbara Johnson, Her Mother and Natural Guardian and Barbara Johnson, Individually v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  4. Romulus v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Collins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
  2. Burchfield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  3. Ronald Warrum, in His Capacity as Personal Representative of the Estate of Joseph F. Sayyah, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  4. Lipkin v. United States Securities & Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  5. Davis v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API