Legal Opinion

Clairol, Inc. v. Sarann Co.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided August 25, 1965No. 845Published

1Opinion of the Court

Spaeth, J.,

Nature of the Case

Plaintiff, a manufacturer of hair care products and cosmetics, seeks to restrain defendant, which operates two discount stores, from selling plaintiff’s product *434“Miss Clairol Hair Color Bath” in a way that plaintiff says constitutes unfair competition and violates an equitable restriction.

Findings of Fact

1. Plaintiff, a Delaware corporation, with its principal place of business in New York City, is engaged in the business of manufacturing and distributing hair care products and cosmetics which bear plaintiff’s trademarks, which trademarks are registered in the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Morgan's Home Equipment Corp. v. MartucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Champion Spark Plug Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Prestonettes, Inc. v. CotySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Waring v. WDAS Broadcasting Station, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Shapiro v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API