Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Gracchi v. Friedlander

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 7, 1928No. Docket No. 6454PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

This is an application for a writ of review against the respondent as commissioner of corporations of the state of California. The petitioners are co-partners, and are doing business under two fictitious names: (1) The California Fur Rabbit Association, and (2) The California Fur Rabbit Farms. They are engaged in selling certain contracts. Each contract consists of two pieces of paper. One paper consists of three documents. The first, one is an order for merchandise; the second is a promissory note; the third is a receipt for the first payment. The first and second documents are printed to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blackwood v. Cutting Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
  2. People v. PaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. People v. McCallaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Lewis v. Creasey Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  5. Walti v. GabaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Domestic & Foreign Petroleum Co. v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Timetrust, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1939
  3. Blackwell v. BentsenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Crude Oil Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. WickhamDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API