Legal Opinion

Appleman v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 21, 1975No. 4057PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Employment Appeals Board (Board) denying petitioner’s claim for unemployment benefits.

The sole issue involved is whether claimant’s employment as a field worker on employer’s tree nursery is “agricultural labor” and, therefore, excluded from unemployment insurance coverage. ORS 657.045. ①

The facts are not in dispute. The employer, Industrial Forestry Association, operates a 60-acre tree seedling nursery. The seeds are specially prepared by the employer and planted in raised beds of soil in its nursery. The soil is plowed, tilled, disced,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Just-A-Mere Farm, Inc. v. PeetOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Roberts v. State Unemployment Compensation CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Southwest Oregon Dairy Herd Improvement Ass'n v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bresgal v. BrockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Ochoa v. Weisensee Ranch, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Bresgal v. BrockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Bresgal v. BrockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Bresgal v. BrockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API