Legal Opinion

Ochoa v. Weisensee Ranch, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 26, 1988No. C11-078; CA A43902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*522BUTTLER, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from the decision of the trial court holding that his work on defendant’s Christmas tree farm constitutes agricultural employment under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 USC § 201 et seq, and that, therefore, he is not entitled to overtime pay for those weeks in which he worked more than 40 hours.

Defendant moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the amount in controversy is less than $250. ORS 19.010(3) provides:

“No appeal to the Court of Appeals shall be taken or allowed in any action for the recovery of money or damages only unless it appears…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Libby v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Moss v. WoodcockOregon Supreme Court · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chao v. North Carolina Growers Ass'nDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2003
  2. Ochoa v. Weisensee Ranch, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. Ochoa v. Weisensee Ranch, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API