Legal Opinion
Southwestern Cable Co. v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Jack O. Gross, Intervenors. Mission Cable Tv, Inc., Pacific Video Cable Co. And Trans-Video Corp. v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Jack O. Gross, Intervenors
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 28, 1967No. 21192PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
378 F.2d 118
SOUTHWESTERN CABLE CO., Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES of America and Federal Communications
Commission, Respondents, Jack O. Gross et al.,
Intervenors.
MISSION CABLE TV, INC., Pacific Video Cable Co. and
Trans-Video Corp., Petitioners,
v.
UNITED STATES of America and Federal Communications
Commission, Respondents, Jack O. Gross et al., Intervenors.
Nos. 21183, 21192.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
April 28, 1967.
Frank U. Fletcher, Robert L. Heald, Edward F. Kenehan, Fletcher, Heald, Rowell, Kenehan & Hildreth, washington, D.C., Tuttle & Taylor, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- National Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Federal Communications Commission v. Sanders Bros. Radio StationSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Storer Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Federal Communications Commission v. SchreiberSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Head v. New Mexico Board of Examiners in OptometrySupreme Court of the United States · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wheeling Antenna Company, Inc. v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Wtrf-Tv, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- Valley Vision, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Valley Vision, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, (Two Cases). Valley Vision, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968